Skip to content
+880 1406-928918Sign in

technology

Irreversible Electroporation (NanoKnife)

A non-thermal image-guided ablation technique used for selected soft-tissue tumours after specialist review.

Educational information, not a diagnosis

Reviewed against authoritative public sources

Urgent symptoms need local emergency care

Understanding this cancer

Irreversible electroporation (IRE) places needle electrodes around a tumour and delivers brief high-voltage electrical pulses. These pulses create permanent pores in cell membranes, leading to cell death. NanoKnife is a trade name for one IRE system; it is not a surgical knife and it is not nanotechnology.

Signs to discuss with a doctor

IRE is a local procedure, not a general treatment for every cancer. Published clinical use has focused on selected difficult-to-treat soft-tissue tumours, including some pancreatic, liver, prostate and kidney settings. Evidence, standard of care and regulatory indications differ by organ and country.

Risk factors

Risks include bleeding, infection, injury to nearby structures, thrombosis, arrhythmia and anaesthesia-related complications. Electrical pulses require cardiac synchronization and specialist safety planning. Risks vary by tumour site.

Tests and diagnosis

Specialist review usually considers contrast imaging, pathology, tumour size and location, vessel or duct involvement, previous treatment, heart rhythm, implanted cardiac devices, clotting status and anaesthetic fitness.

Treatment approaches

IRE may be discussed when a multidisciplinary team believes local ablation is appropriate and thermal ablation or surgery is unsuitable or carries specific concerns. It may be combined with systemic treatment. It is not proven superior for every indication.

Prevention and screening

This technology does not prevent cancer and is not a screening test. The goal may be local control or palliation, depending on the confirmed disease and care plan.

Questions for your care team

Why is IRE being considered instead of surgery, radiation or thermal ablation? Is this use standard, guideline-supported or investigational? What outcome is intended? What nearby structures and heart-related risks apply?